Analyzing the Implications of Changes to the Full Retirement Age
Andrew Biggs, in an article posted on www.forbes.com, takes a look at the argument against delaying the Social Security Full Retirement Age (FRA), reasoning that raising the retirement age is neither regressive nor progressive. Rather, he suggests that a change like this would result in “an across-the-board percentage cut in benefits.” Read the article here…
This posting is presented for informational purposes only and does not represent legal or financial guidance. Any opinions or interpretations presented are either those of the original author or, in the case of articles authored by the AMAC Foundation, are the opinions of AMAC Foundation staff, originally trained and accredited by the National Social Security Association (NSSA) and certified via the AMAC Foundation. Any links included in the article are valid on the posted date; socialsecurityreport.org cannot guarantee the duration of the links’ validity. NSSA and the AMAC Foundation and its staff are not affiliated with or endorsed by the Social Security Administration or any other governmental entity. To submit a question, visit our website (https://amacfoundation.org/services/) or email us at ssadvisor@amacfoundation.org. Because we are a non-profit organization, there is no charge for these services.