“Political Intrigue” Sidelines WEP-GPO Bill…For Now, Anyway. - rollcall.com
The House Bill to repeal the longstanding and much-aligned Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP) and Government Pension Offset (GPO) Social Security rules appeared headed to a forced floor vote, at least until yesterday. In a procedural move described as “unusual,” outgoing Rep. Bob Good, R-Va., advanced a “request to lay the Social Security bill on the table,” rendering the bill “dead for the time being.”
Rep. Good’s motion, agreed to with no objections during the 7-minute pro forma House session, stops the forward motion on H.R. 82 (titled “Social Security Fairness Act of 2023”) until the bill’s primary sponsors–Reps. Garret Graves, R-La., and Abigail Spanberger, D-Va.–develop an alternate approach to achieving the floor vote. The primary objection driving the move to block progress on the bill appears to be the $196 billion price the Congressional Budget Office has identified in the bill, coupled with the impact on Social Security’s already precarious financial situation.
The Importance of Understanding WEP and GPO
As we reported on this website earlier this week, many legislative attempts have been made to fully repeal WEP and GPO, with no prior action taken. The issue is controversial, to be sure, and there are two sides to the argument. For this reason, and in response to many questions from readers, the AMAC Foundation has heavily researched the origin of these two troublesome provisions, concluding that the purpose behind their design is often not clearly understood, nor is the way the math works in support of the original purpose. The Foundation offered a publication (WEP and GPO: To Repeal or Not?) to help clarify the matter and conducted a public webinar presenting thoughts on the subject. A recording of the webinar can be viewed on the Foundation website here.
What is a “pro forma” session?
According to the Congressional Research Service, pro forma sessions are intended primarily as “a daily session whose existence prevents the occurrence of a recess of the annual session or forestalls a sine die adjournment” and are used to accommodate the rule that requires either the House or the Senate to remain in session consistently during the regular congressional schedule. Typically, convening a pro forma session does not lead to voting or conducting legislative business…this one was different, as described in a Roll Call post last evening (check it out in full here).