Q & A
Is Citizenship Required for Social Security Disability or Retirement Benefits?
Answer: Many believe that American citizenship is needed to receive Social Security benefits. But that’s not true. Resident aliens (or “green card” holders) may qualify to receive Social Security payments, as long as they meet some additional guidelines, such as having 10 years of work in the U.S. under their belts. If you work in the US, and pay taxes here, including “FICA” taxes that fund SOcial Security, you are fully eligible to draw on those contributions if you are disabled or when retire. Read more…
Source: www.disability-links.com
This posting is presented for informational purposes only and does not represent legal or financial guidance. Any opinions or interpretations presented are either those of the original author or, in the case of articles authored by the AMAC Foundation, are the opinions of AMAC Foundation staff, originally trained and accredited by the National Social Security Association (NSSA) and certified via the AMAC Foundation. Any links included in the article are valid on the posted date; socialsecurityreport.org cannot guarantee the duration of the links’ validity. NSSA and the AMAC Foundation and its staff are not affiliated with or endorsed by the Social Security Administration or any other governmental entity. To submit a question, visit our website (https://amacfoundation.org/services/) or email us at ssadvisor@amacfoundation.org. Because we are a non-profit organization, there is no charge for these services.
Robert wrote, AMac is obsessed with the Tiljander prxeios, but has never been able to formulate any kind of a scientific argument against the way they are used in climate reconstructions. Robert appears to be implying that there are plausible scientific arguments in favor of the way the Tiljander data series are used in the climate reconstructions presented in Mann08.If that is his claim, I applaud him it’s the strongest possible defense of that paper, thus also of subsequent papers that rely on its reconstructions. (The authors of Kemp11 chose to compare their sea level findings to Composite EIV global land plus ocean global temperature reconstruction (see Figs. 2A, 4A, S3,S4, and S5). This recon is from Mann08 s S.I. figure S6, panel F.)It is perhaps noteworthy that There are plausible scientific arguments is rarely if ever advanced by knowledgeable defenders of Mann08 s use of the Tiljander data series.Instead, it’s proposed that We can’t know one way or the other’, or It doesn’t matter’, or It’s too complicated for non-experts to grasp.’ Ad hominems also make an appearance.The difficulty may be that the strong assertion There are plausible scientific arguments in favor of Mann08 s use of the Tiljander series invites obvious follow-on questions that have only unsatisfying answers.I have laid out the problems with how Mann08 employed the Tiljander series at my blog. One can start with yesterday’s and work out from there. Good discussion in the comments, too.