Examining DOGE’s Reduced Savings Targets
Before concluding that the reduction in savings, from trillions to well less than $200 billion, indicates less-than-anticipated opportunities, it’s essential to take a fresh look at the key contributors to government spending. A CATO Institute post last week by Policy Scholar Ryan Bourne offers the viewpoint that it would be “…ridiculous to assume that DOGE’s failure to cut more spending shows that there’s little fat left in the federal government.” Bourne’s analysis suggests reexamination of the core principles embodied in certain major “entitlement” programs to weigh their necessity in today’s economy. Read the full article here…
The link provided above connects readers to the full content of the posted article. The URL (internet address) for this link is valid on the posted date; socialsecurityreport.org cannot guarantee the duration of the link’s validity. Also, the opinions expressed in these postings are the viewpoints of the original source and are not explicitly endorsed by AMAC, Inc.; the AMAC Foundation, Inc.; or socialsecurityreport.org.