Latest News

Still Another Opposing Comment on the WEP-GPO Repeal Effort

Today’s headline article on the march toward a Senate vote on S. 597 (Social Security Fairness Act) presents viewpoints opposite from most of the supporting articles carried on the airwaves over the past several months. That’s to be expected since Social Security’s Windfall Elimination Provision and Government Pension Offset are controversial and poorly understood by the general public. This lack of clarity is driven home again in a post by AEI Senior Fellow Andrew G. Biggs, using examples that illustrate the way these two Social Security program components work. Take a look at Biggs’ post, which you can access here.

As has been our objective since WEP-GPO repeal efforts gained momentum in the 118th Congress, citing this post and providing the information in today’s headline post is consistent with the AMAC Foundation’s mission of providing education on complex issues. There are two sides to many legislative problems; this is a classic example. We hope that understanding both sides will result in opponents and proponents making an informed decision.

The second link provided above connects readers to the full content of the posted article. The URL (internet address) for this link is valid on the posted date; socialsecurityreport.org cannot guarantee the duration of the link’s validity. Also, the opinions expressed in these postings are the viewpoints of the original source and are not explicitly endorsed by AMAC, Inc.; the AMAC Foundation, Inc.; or socialsecurityreport.org.

What's Your Opinion?

We welcome your comments. Join the discussion and let your voice be heard. All fields are required

Website by Geiger Computers