Latest News

The Continuing “Income Replacement Rate” Debate

When planning retirement finances, the question of how much is needed to ensure a comfortable existence always seems to generate a lot of discussion. Beginning with Social Security as a base, the question becomes what other sources of income does one need to offset one’s pre-retirement cash flow? One of the more popular lines of thought as that you need to ensure that you are attaining an income level of at least 70% of where you were pre-retirement, but that’s where the debate comes in. Professor Laurence J. Kotlikoff, provides some thought-provoking comments on why this rate is actually dangerously low. Read his post here… 

 

Notice: The link provided above connects readers to the full content of the posted article. The URL (internet address) for this link is valid on the posted date; socialsecurityreport.org cannot guarantee the duration of the link’s validity. Also, the opinions expressed in these postings are the viewpoints of the original source and are not explicitly endorsed by AMAC, Inc.; the AMAC Foundation, Inc.; or socialsecurityreport.org.

What's Your Opinion?

We welcome your comments. Join the discussion and let your voice be heard. All fields are required

Website by Geiger Computers