Latest News
The Debate About Proposed Review of Disability Cases
Do you remember your High School debate club, where two people debated opposite sides of an issue? Such is the case in this USA Today article which discusses a recent proposal by the Administration to more actively review existing Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) cases to ensure that some recipients are still disabled and unable to work. The first part of the article, argued by USA Today’s editorial board, is in favor of the new proposal to more frequently review cases of those whose disability isn’t deemed as permanent. The second part of the article, argued by Rebecca Vallas, relates the author’s opinion that this proposal is just another cruel example of the Administration’s slashing of “the safety net.” It’s up to you to decide which position best agrees with your own. Click here to read more.
This posting is presented for informational purposes only and does not represent legal or financial guidance. Any opinions or interpretations presented are either those of the original author or, in the case of articles authored by the AMAC Foundation, are the opinions of AMAC Foundation staff, originally trained and accredited by the National Social Security Association (NSSA) and certified via the AMAC Foundation. Any links included in the article are valid on the posted date; socialsecurityreport.org cannot guarantee the duration of the links’ validity. NSSA and the AMAC Foundation and its staff are not affiliated with or endorsed by the Social Security Administration or any other governmental entity. To submit a question, visit our website (https://amacfoundation.org/services/) or email us at ssadvisor@amacfoundation.org. Because we are a non-profit organization, there is no charge for these services.