Social Security Solvency News: Cassidy-Kaine “Big Idea” Draws Fire - 24wallst.com

The issue of Social Security’s rapidly approaching financial disaster–the full depletion of trust fund reserves and the benefit reduction to follow–is (finally) getting increased attention. Many organizations are weighing in with proposals to address the insolvency problem, and lawmakers are beginning to notice. Take, for example, the Senate Budget Committee’s March 29 hearing, “Social Security: A Discussion on the Facts and the Path Forward,” in which a slate of experts offered state-of-the-program assessments of where Social Security is headed and what needs to be done to correct its trajectory.

Prominent in the March 29 Budget Committee hearing was a discussion led by Senator Bill Cassidy (R-LA) describing a bipartisan proposal he and Sen. Tim Kaine (D-VA) have advanced for consideration. The Cassidy/Kaine proposal, dubbed a “Big Idea,” was a follow-up to President Trump’s February 3, 2025 executive order calling for creation of a sovereign wealth fund completely separate from Social Security’s trust funds and using investment earnings sufficient to fund the projected revenue shortfall (the background of this proposal was covered in a website post in 2023, which can be viewed in full here.)

The Cassidy/Kaine “Big Idea” exemplifies the type of unconventional thinking that many consider important in deliberations on Social Security’s future. It has, however, come under fire from several quarters since its introduction, most recently in the form of comments from the Center for Retirement Research (CRR) outlined in a 24wallst.com post by contributor Christy Bieber. Ms. Bieber’s summary of CRR’s concern focuses on the high-risk nature of the Big Idea’s strategy and the very real chance that the expected returns would not materialize. Read Ms. Bieber’s analysis here.

This posting is presented for informational purposes only and does not represent legal or financial guidance. Any opinions or interpretations presented are either those of the original author or, in the case of articles authored by the AMAC Foundation, are the opinions of AMAC Foundation staff, originally trained and accredited by the National Social Security Association (NSSA) and certified via the AMAC Foundation. Any links included in the article are valid on the posted date; socialsecurityreport.org cannot guarantee the duration of the links’ validity. NSSA and the AMAC Foundation and its staff are not affiliated with or endorsed by the Social Security Administration or any other governmental entity. To submit a question, visit our website (https://amacfoundation.org/services/) or email us at ssadvisor@amacfoundation.org. Because we are a non-profit organization, there is no charge for these services.

Website by Geiger Computers