Latest News
Another View on Social Security 2100: The Impact of Expansion
One of the underlying objectives of the H.R. 860–the Social Security 2100 Act–now the subject of House Ways and Means Committee hearings is to achieve expansion of the program, funded by increased payroll taxation. Is it good, or is it not so good? That’s the premise of an article Rachel Greszler, a senior policy analyst specializing in economics and entitlements at The Heritage Foundation’s Center for Data Analysis. Her conclusion is summed in this statement, “There simply isn’t any economic benefit, moral argument, or social safety net role for imposing higher taxes across the board in order to provide middle- and upper-income earners with more money for golf green fees and gifts for grandchildren.” Read her nationalinterest.org/blog post here…
This posting is presented for informational purposes only and does not represent legal or financial guidance. Any opinions or interpretations presented are either those of the original author or, in the case of articles authored by the AMAC Foundation, are the opinions of AMAC Foundation staff, originally trained and accredited by the National Social Security Association (NSSA) and certified via the AMAC Foundation. Any links included in the article are valid on the posted date; socialsecurityreport.org cannot guarantee the duration of the links’ validity. NSSA and the AMAC Foundation and its staff are not affiliated with or endorsed by the Social Security Administration or any other governmental entity. To submit a question, visit our website (https://amacfoundation.org/services/) or email us at ssadvisor@amacfoundation.org. Because we are a non-profit organization, there is no charge for these services.